Company
By
Asok Nadhani
1.1 Applicability
i.
The Companies Act, 1956 came
into force on 1.4.1956.
ii.
It extends to whole of India (Sec.1).
1.2 Company
i.
‘Company’ means a company incorporated under the
Companies Act, 1956 or any Companies Act enacted prior to that [Sec. 3(1) (i)].
ii. A company refers
to a group of persons associated for a common object or purpose.
iii.
A company is a voluntary association for profit
with capital divisible into transferable shares with limited liability, having
corporate entity and a common seal with perpetual succession.
1.2.1 Body corporate
i. Generally, the
term ‘body corporate’ or ‘corporation’ means an association of persons having following characteristics:
a. Incorporated or
registered under any law
b. Separate legal
entity,
c. Perpetual
succession.
d. Common seal.
e. Own property in
its own name
f. Capacity to sue
and be sued in its own name.
ii. Body Corporate' includes the following:
a.
Company
formed under the Companies Act, 1956
b.
Corporation
formed under an Act of Parliament or State Legislature
c.
Foreign
company
d.
Company
incorporated outside India
e.
Nationalised
bank
f.
Public
financial Institution.
iii. 'Body corporate' or 'corporation' does not include:
[s. 2(7)]
a.
a
corporation sole (e.g., the
office of a President, Governor, Chief Minister, Public Trustee)
b.
a
registered co-operative society;
c.
any
other body corporate (not being a company as defined in this Act), notified by
Central
Government;
d.
A
registered society.
iv.
So,
the term 'body corporate' is wider than the term 'company'. Every Incorporated
Company is a Body Corporate. But every Body Corporate is not a Company.
1.3
Characteristics of a Company
a. The common
characteristics of the company are as follows:
Separate Legal Entity
Limited Liability
Perpetual succession
Common seal
Transferability of shares
Separate property
To Sue and being Sued
Limitation of action
Representative management
b.
These characteristics are explained below :
i. Separate Legal
Entity
A company is a legal person
in the eyes of law distinct from the individuals who are its members .It gets
an independent corporate existence and acquires a separate identity from
the individual members forming it. It can enter into contracts with any other
person in the same way as any other individual. [Salomon v. Salomon
& Co. Ltd.], [Abdul Haq Vs Das Mal], [Kondoli Tea Co.
Ltd.] Ex.1.1
a.
A
Company is regarded as a separate entity from its members.
b.
It
has an independent corporate existence.
c.
It
is an artificial person, known by its Name, with capacity to own money &
property, sue & be sued in its own name.
d.
Members
cannot claim to be the same as that of Company.
e.
Assets
and liabilities belong to the Company and not to the Members.
f.
Dealings
by or with the Company are carried out in its own name and not as collective
agent of its members.
g.
Shareholders
do not have any insurable interest in Company's property.
h.
Any
member may enter into a contract with the Company.
i.
Members
may also be the Company's Creditors or Employees.
j.
The
Company continues to exist, till it is wound up. Death, insanity, insolvency,
etc. of shareholder does not affect the Company's existence.
k.
Nationality
of the Company does not depend on the nationality of its shareholders.
ii. Limited Liability
Liability of
members of a limited company, are limited irrespective of the liability of the company.
iii. Perpetual
succession
The continuity of the
company doesn’t come to an end with any sort or incapacity of any or all the
members of the company. A company is
created by a process of law and remains in existence till it is wound up by the
process of law only. Ex.1.2
- Common seal
The
company itself cannot sign any document as it is not human being. So, the
common seal with the name of the company engraved on it is used as a substitute
for its signature. All documents issued
by a company or on its behalf bear the common seal.
v.
Transferability of shares
The
shareholders may dispose of their shares to others. So no shareholder is
permanently or necessarily wedded to the company.
vi.
Separate property
A
company is a separate entity from its members. So it is a legal person capable
of owning and disposing of property in its own name. Although its capital and
assets are contributed by its shareholders or the members, the members are not the co-owners of the property of the
company. So they do not have any ownership right of the property of the company.
[Macaura v Northern Assuarance Co.
Ltd.], Ex.1.1
vii. To Sue and being Sued
A company can sue and be
sued in its corporate name. It may also inflict or suffer wrongs. In fact, it
can do or have done to it most of the things which could be done by or to a human
being.
viii.Limitation of action
a. The creditors can make their claims
(limitation) only against Company and cannot proceed against shareholders.
Their action stops with company.
b. Only the Company can call for any unpaid
capital from its shareholders.
ix.
Representative
Management
The Company is managed by elected representatives of
the shareholders viz., Directors, collectively referred to as the ‘Board’.
1.4 Advantages of incorporation
i.
Separate legal entity/Corporate personality
ii.
Perpetual Succession
iii. Limited Liability
of members
iv. Transfer of
shares
v.
Separation of ownership from management
vi. Separate
property
vii. Capacity to sue
and be sued in its own name
viii. Limitation of
action
ix. Death, Insolvency, Insanity or separation
of members does not affect the continuity of the Company.
x.
Can
have property in its own name.
xi. No limit to the maximum number of members
in a Public Limited Company.
xii. Huge amounts can be mobilized through a
public issue, to undertake ventures requiring huge investments.
xiii. Directors manage the Company's affairs separating
the ownership and management.
1.5 Disadvantages of incorporation
i.
Formalities of incorporation
Incorporation of
a company requires many formalities, like availability of name, preparation of
various documents like memorandum, articles, statutory declaration etc., filing
of various forms and returns, etc., which are time consuming and expensive.
ii.
Lifting
of corporate veil
In various
circumstances, the Court may lift the corporate veil, and make liable the members, directors or other
officers of the company for acts done on behalf of the company.
iii.
No
rights of citizens
A company is not a citizen,
and therefore it cannot avail of the fundamental rights available to citizens.
iv.
Dispersed
membership
Lack of control by members over
the affairs of the company as most of the members may not attend the
general meetings of the company.
v.
High
tax liabilities
Tax rates
applicable to companies are higher compared to other forms of business
organization.
vi.
No Secrecy
The published
and filed annual accounts unveils its internal information to the public.
vii.
Regular filing of returns and forms
A company has to
regularly file various returns and forms as required under Companies Act, 1956.
viii.
Approvals and Sanctions
Approval of various authorities, like Central
Government, Company Law Board and Court are required causing delays involving
heavy expenditure.
ix.
Corporate
Governance
Corporate governance calls for total transparency,
integrity and accountability of the management, and discharge of social
responsibility of the company, imposing a lot of burden of social
responsibilities on companies.
x.
Expensive
and time consuming winding up procedure
Winding up of Companies is very expensive and time
consuming process with legal hurdles.
xi.
Strict
Legal Provisions
The Companies Act, 1956 is an enormous legislation.
Its compliance requires experts and consultants, attracting penalties and legal
actions.
xii.
Corporate Frauds
As control of economic resources is in few hands, there
is possibility of huge frauds.
1.6
Corporate Veil
A company is a separate
legal person distinct from its members. The law creates a fictional veil by
which a company is not seen as an association of person, but seen as a separate
person. This fictional veil of incorporation is perceived as ‘Corporate
veil’.
1.6.1
Effect of Corporate Veil
i.
The effect of corporate veil is that the company is
regarded as a distinct person having its own rights and liabilities, its own
powers and functions, and its own property.
§ The business is
carried on by the company and not by the directors or the members.
§ A contract made
by any officer, employee or director binds the company only when made on behalf
of the company.
§ The company is
liable for the acts (and defaults) done by members, directors, officer or
employee of the company, on behalf of the company, under authority.
§ Any profit, loss
or liability arising from any transaction or contract made on behalf of the
company shall accrue only to the company.
§ The property of
the company belongs only to the company. No member can claim any ownership
right or insurable interest in the property of the company.
§ A company can
enter into a contract with any director or member of the company in the same
way as the company enters into a contract with an outsider.
§ Any person can
be a member, creditor, director and employee of the company at the same time.
ii.
Thus, it is seen that the overall effect of the
‘corporate veil’ is that a company is regarded as a distinct person having its
own rights and liabilities, its own powers and functions, and its own property.
1.6.2
Lifting of Corporate Veil
As a general
rule, the corporate veil is not allowed to be lifted. However, in some special circumstances
the corporate veil may be lifted, like:
-
To prevent improper means
- Protection of
revenue
- Prevention of fraud
or
improper conduct
- To
determine whether an enemy
company
- Where the company
is a sham
- Company avoiding
legal obligations
- Company acting as agent or trustee of the shareholders
- Avoidance of
welfare legislation
- Protecting public
policy
-
For Statutory violations
- Number of members below statutory minimum
(Sec. 45)
- Failure to refund application money [Sec. 69
(5)]
- Acts without company's name [Sec. 147
(4)]
- Fraudulent Trading (Sec. 542)
- Holding and subsidiary companies ((Sec. 212)
- Misrepresentation in the prospectus (Sec. 62)
- Non-recovery Tax
i.
Corporate veil lifted to prevent improper means:
The corporate veil may be
lifted to prevent improper means in cases like :
a.
Protection of revenue: The corporate
veil may be lifted when it is used as a means for tax evasion. [Sir
Dinshaw Maneckjee Petit], [Dinshaw
Maneckjee Petit]
b.
Prevention of fraud or improper conduct: The corporate veil may be lifted if the company is formed to: [Jones v. Lipman]; [Daimler Co. Ltd. v. Continental Tyre & Rubber Co. Ltd]; [PNB Finance vs.
Shital Pd. Jain]
-
defeat the law
-
defraud the creditors
-
avoid legal obligations
(arising by way of a contract).
c.
To
determine whether an enemy
company: The corporate veil may be lifted to examine
the character of persons in real control of the company to determine whether a
company is an enemy company. [Daimler Co. Ltd. v. Continental Tyre & Rubber Co. Ltd.]; [Gilford
Motor Co. Ud. v. Home]
d.
Where the company is a sham:
The corporate veil may be lifted where a company is a mere cloak or sham (hoax). [Jones
v. Lipman]; [Gilford
Motor Co. Ud. v. Home];
[F.
G. Films Ltd.]
e.
Company avoiding legal
obligations: The corporate veil may be lifted if the
only purpose of its incorporation is to avoid legal obligation. In such case, legal
personality is disregarded assuming as if no company existed. [Jyoti Limited vs. Kanwaljit Kaur Bhasin]
f.
Company acting as agent or trustee of the shareholders:
Where the company is just acting as an agent of the shareholders, shareholders
will be made liable for the acts of the company.
- Avoidance of welfare legislation: The corporate veil may be lifted if the only purpose of
incorporating the company is to avoid a welfare legislation.
h.
Protecting public policy: The corporate veil may be lifted to protect public policy and to
prevent actions contrary to the public policy. [Connors
Bros. Vs Connors.]
ii.
Corporate veil lifted for Statutory Violations:
The corporate veil may be
lifted on violation of statutory rules like:
a.
Number of members below
statutory minimum (Sec. 45): If a company carries on business for
more than 6 months after the number of its members has been reduced below
statutory minimum (7 in case of a public company or 2 in case of a private
company), the remaining or continuing members (those who continue to be members after six months) shall become
personally liable and be severally sued for the debts contracted by the company
during that period (i.e after 6 months).
b.
Failure to refund
application money [Sec. 69 (5)]: If the company fails to refund the
application money of those applicants who have not been allotted shares, within
130 days of the date of issue of the prospectus; the directors become jointly
and severally liable to repay the application money with interest at the rate
of 6 per cent per annum.
c.
Acts without company's
name [Sec. 147 (4)]: An officer or agent of a
company entering into a contract on behalf of the company, without mentioning
the name of the company becomes personally liable for such act.
d.
Fraudulent Trading (Sec. 542): In
the course of winding up of a company, if it appears that some business of the
company has been carried on with intent to defraud creditor of the company (or
any other person) for fraudulent purpose, any person who is knowingly party to
the carrying on such business is personally liable without any limitation of
liability for the debts or other liabilities of the company.
e.
Holding and subsidiary companies: In the
eyes of the law, the holding company and its subsidiary companies are separate
legal entities. But in the following circumstances, a subsidiary company may
lose its separate identity :
i.
If a holding company, at the end of the year, fails
to submit the accounts of the subsidiary company and the collective state of
affairs including the subsidiary company, (Sec. 212)
ii.
Where a subsidiary company is functioning merely as
a branch or department of one large undertaking owned by the holding company. [Workmen of Associated Rubber Industries Ltd. Vs
Associated Rubber Industries Ltd.]
f.
Misrepresentation in the prospectus (Sec. 62): In
case of misrepresentation in a prospectus, every director, promoter and every
other person, who authorized the issue of such a prospectus incurs liability
towards those who subscribe for share on the faith of the untrue statement.
g.
Non-recovery of Tax:
i.
Under section 18 of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956,
when any private company is wound up, any tax assessed on the company cannot be
recovered, then, every person who was a director of the private company at any
time during the period for which the tax is due shall be jointly and severally
liable for the payment of such tax.
ii.
Under section 179 of Income Tax Act 1961, where any
tax due from a private company cannot be recovered, then, every person who was
a director of the private company at any time during the relevant previous year
shall be jointly and severally liable for the payment of such tax.
iii.
Effect of Lifting Corporate Veil: When a
corporate veil is lifted, the person acting on behalf of the company becomes
personally liable.
1.7 Difference between Company and Partnership firm
|
Basis
|
Company
|
Partnership
|
|
i.
Regulating Act
|
Regulated by
the Companies Act, 1956.
|
Governed by the
Indian Partnership Act, 1932.
|
|
ii.
Mode of creation
|
Comes into
existence after incorporation under
the Companies Act, 1956.
|
Comes into existence by an
agreement between the partners. Registration not compulsory.
|
|
iii.
Legal status
|
Has its own
separate legal identity.
|
Has no separate legal
identity.
|
|
iv.
Liability of members
|
The liability
of the members is generally limited.
|
Liability of
the partners are unlimited.
|
|
v.
Management
|
Managed by
Board of directors
|
Managed by
partners themselves.
|
|
vi.
Transferability of
shares
|
A member can
transfer his shares. On such transfer, the transferee becomes the member of
the company.
|
A partner can
also transfer his shares to an outsider. But the transferee does not become a
partner in a firm, though he may be entitled to share the profits of the
firm.
|
|
vii.
Powers
|
Company's
powers are limited to those specified in its Memorandum and Articles of Association.
|
A partnership
firm can do anything which the partners agree to do.
|
|
viii. Insolvency and winding up
|
Members do not
become insolvent when company is insolvent.
|
The insolvency
of a partnership firm means insolvency of the partners.
|
|
ix.
Claim on assets
|
In case of
winding up, a member and a creditor to whom the company owes a debt, stand in
same rank to claim payment out of its assets.
|
In case of winding
up, a partner to whom the company owes a debt, cannot stand in competition to
a creditor to claim payment out of its assets.
|
|
x.
Dissolution
|
A company has a
perpetual succession. So members’ incapacity does not affect its existence.
It comes to an end only when it is wound up according to the provisions of
the Companies Act.
|
May be
dissolved at any time by any partner, and may get dissolved by the death or insolvency
of a partner.
|
|
xi.
Number of members
|
Private company
: Min. 2 members
Max. 7 members.
Public company
: Min. 50 members
Max. Unlimited.
|
Min: 2 members.
Max: 10 members in Banking
business, 20 members in any other business.
|
|
xii. Audit of Accounts
|
A company must
have its accounts audited annually by qualified auditors
|
There is no statutory
provision for audit by qualified auditors.
|
|
xiii.
Separate Property
|
A company has
separate property.
|
A firm has no
separate property. The property of the firm is held in the name of the
partners.
|
|
xiv.
Capacity to sue and be
sued
|
A company can
use and be sued in its own name.
|
A firm cannot
sue and be sued in its own name.
|
|
xv.
Rights or creditors
|
No creditor of
the company has a right to proceed against any member for recovery of any amount
payable by the company, even if a member holds partly paid shares.
|
The creditors
of the firm are the creditors of the individual partners. A decree obtained
against the firm can be executed against the partners jointly and severally.
|
1.8 Company as a Partner
a.
A
partnership results from an agreement between two or more ‘persons’ (called as
partners). Since a Company is an ‘artificial person’ having separate identity
and capable of entering into contracts, a company can enter into partnership
with any natural or artificial person.
b.
A company can become a partner in a firm if -
i. the memorandum
of the company authorises the company to do so;
ii. the contract to
enter into partnership is not ultra vires the company, i.e., the business
of partnership is contained in the object clause of memorandum.
1.9 Citizenship
i.
A Company is not a citizen either under (a) the
Constitution of India or (b) the Citizenship Act, 1955.
ii.
A Company does not enjoy the fundamental rights,
which are expressly available to citizen only.
iii.
Company can claim those fundamental rights which
are available to all persons, e.g. Rights to own property, Right to Equality,
etc.
1.10 Residential
Status
I. A Company has a
Nationality, Domicile and Residence as per the Country of its Incorporation.
II.
A Company ordinarily resides where the central
control and management of its business is exercised.
Examples:
Separate Legal Entity
Ex.1.1 Mr. A is a shareholder of A
& Co. Ltd. Thus, A & Co. Ltd is an entirely different person from Mr. A
even if he holds practically all the shares in the company. The property of A
& Co. Ltd is not the property of Mr. A. [Ref.
1.3(b(i, vi))]
Perpetual Succession
Ex.1.2 All the members of X Ltd. Co. dies in a plane crash. The shares are transmitted to
their respective legal representatives who become the members of the company.
Thus even death of all the members could not bring the company to an end. The company has a perpetual succession and
remains in existence. [Ref. 1.3(b(iii))]
For more details, refer
to Business & Corporate Laws, by Asok Nadhani, BPB Publications, www.bpbonline.com,
bpbpublications@gmail.com